Before search-engines got wise, a site's site position was predicated on keyword match-ups. When webmasters stock-piled their sites with key words, the wrong sites were receiving too much attention. Google chose to give attention to a site's 'acceptance' rather. The amount of incoming links became the focus of PR standards. The idea behind this system was that if a lot of sites connect to still another site, that site would contain valuable information.
But again, webmasters got sly. With this development, we started to start to see the evolution of 'Link Farms' and 'Free-for-All' (FFA) web sites. These pages were essentially a collection of (quite often) useless links. In most cases, the web sites weren't labeled or detailed. They became a place for webmasters to eliminate their links so that you can make their site appear more popular. Dig up further on this affiliated website - Click this web page: atmospheric salience moziaqitvlax.
This plan worked for quite a while, but soon search engines caught on. 'Link Farms' and FFA internet sites served no purpose to internet users. Since Google prides it self on catering to internet users (and PERHAPS not builders), a solution had to be established. 'Link Farms' were cluttering up the net and making it more challenging for customers to get valuable resources o-nline.
Google soon started to rate the standard of the links that identified a site's 'link pop.' 'Link Farms' and FFA sites became labeled as junk, and thus led no importance to your site's link popularity.
To-day, submitting to your 'Link Farm' or FFA site may be bad for your website's name. Google requires a strong position against such link pages. At most readily useful, the 'Link Farm' can drag down your position and make it harder for that useful web sites to work in your favor. At worst, your site is going to be BARRED completely for using junk sites to try to create traffic. This can be a very real possibility.
'Link Farms' and FFA websites provide very little importance. Quality or relevant links will not be obtained by users in the submission, though it may sound tempting. Plus, who wants to see their link among 'junk' sites for adult activity, online dating sites, and casinos? Submitting to 'Link Farms' doesn't subscribe to your standing and is simply not worth the risk.
Alternatively, spend your own time submitting to credible websites