Now, there's certainly not something wrong with this, I only think that authors who are doing this are missing out on potential traffic and/or customers. Such source boxes will simply gain their site rankings in a...
I run an article directory on my site, and I am seeing an increasing number of articles being submitted, solely for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. This is most likely because of the growing variety of PLR articles and material that's becoming available.
Today, there's certainly not anything wrong with this, I just believe that writers who are doing this are missing out on potential traffic and/or customers. Such reference boxes is only going to benefit their site ratings in any search engine that values incoming links.
Is this a bad thing? No. Where they're losing out can be as follows. Identify new info on our affiliated URL - Click here: linklicious pro talk.
Much of the traffic to my article index comes from search engines, by people trying to find information on a certain subject. Now, this user types in their key words, clicks o-n the search box, and is given a summary of relevant sites. They chose one, and are taken to the author's article. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, think 'This is interesting' and go to the author's source box at the conclusion of the article to see what else they have to say on this subject. There, they locate a link to some site advertising portable ringtones. Discover supplementary info on this affiliated wiki by visiting visit free linklicious alternative. May be the audience planning to be impressed, or interested in this? Not so likely. They would like to learn about snowboarding, not modify their phone. I believe among three things will happen then:
The audience leaves the whole site in disgust.
The reader clicks on a link to your related article. Identify more on linklicious warrior forum by browsing our poetic paper.
The viewer clicks on the relevant Google Ad-sense (or similar contextual marketing) offer.
They do not click the author's reference link. That is a possible client lost, very probably permanently.
Yes, put a link in to your site in the resource package, but many article websites allow many links, therefore for goodness sake put a link in