AA Car Transport said... It about time!
with all the hard work we do to write good content (damm i hire in house girl with BA to write articles) the next step will be to find all the copycat that take my content spin it to 9,000,000 directory and pass me at SERP
April 24, 2012 3:09 PM JP Dean Adams said... Fire away Matt and thanks for doing that. You mention in your post that it gives a better user experience and almost everybody is in favor of that but at the same time it's a lot less frustrating for everybody that plays by Google's rules and try to create great content. So again, thank you for that. :)
"Matt Rocks, Matt for President".
April 24, 2012 3:11 PM tikvenik said... Love those changes! This means more work for us - the copywriters :)
April 24, 2012 3:50 PM Lysis said... And nothing of value was lost....
April 24, 2012 4:31 PM FilmsFight said... So far today's search results are worse than they've been for the past month. On one search for a keyword phrase there's a completely unrelated Wikipedia page, a random Twitter account for some company, and a page from an independent search engine from 1997 showing in the top 10 results. Yeah, that's the kind of quality user experience we want to see. Way to knock it out of the park.
April 24, 2012 4:39 PM martin said... well now more rubbish results appearing in search than before. more exact domain name match results and unrelated websites . Google failed once again.
April 24, 2012 5:04 PM Vince Aquino said... This is great! We have been slaving on writing quality content just to be copied and spinned. Hope those sites copying my content would really go down in ranking.
April 24, 2012 5:08 PM sajid said... so many .info, .co unrelated domains ranked for respected queries. are you sure no mistake in this update?
you said " even no search engine optimization at all"
that mean seo dead now?
April 24, 2012 5:17 PM John Edwards said... Make sure you don't get penalized for duplicate content on this post Matt! It was 'cross published' on the Inside Search blog and both posts have a canonical tag link referencing their own URL.
April 24, 2012 5:17 PM Senior Marketing said... Is that means that my competitors could get all my sites using xrumer like software?
April 24, 2012 5:29 PM AbbyInk said.