Karan C

It would be prudent for us if you sent me a message that you no longer want to talk/stay connected if you:

• State that victims of dog attacks “provoke” the attack.
• Are unaware that 4.700,000 - trending upwards - dog attacks occur in the U.S. annually, and that this doesn't include tackles, thefts, licks, harassment with threats, and unreported assaults (read: the police refuse to make a report). Well, now you’re aware.
• Support statements that dog owners/dog lovers are “animal lovers”, while dogs attack farm animals, endangered species, are given precedence to other animals' in queue for animal hospital emergencies, and are responsible for an outrageous proportion of all animal injuries. Here are just some such sources from a mere 3-mo interval: https://justpaste.it/c0sol
• State “dogs will be dogs” or “It’s a dog!” as a justification for making threats at people.
• Call yourself a “progressive” yet do not support legislation (granted, there’s hardly any) that holds dogs and dog owners accountable for harassment and injurious actions against people.
• Call yourself “pro-life” yet are heretical in a lack of acknowledgement of biblical phrases about dogs, and haven’t a single word for the youngest of us who are killed and disfigured by dog attacks.
• Call yourself “woke” yet do not recognize dog ownership, in its prevalent form, as a social issue and one that brings with it the hierarchy of privilege.
• Spend all day raving about how “evil” cats are, while hypocritically not uttering a single word in challenge of dog attacks.
• Have off-leash dogs.
• Believe the rights of “emotional support animals” are superior to those of people with dog allergies.
• Believe that a dog or dog owner has any right to complain about noise from a child, or threaten the child with a mauling for continued noise.
• Believe the action of a dog licking, sniffing, kissing, or chasing someone without their consent is cute or virtuous.
• Call yourself an environmental activist, yet profess ignorance of canine carbon footprints.
• Are a fan of gaming YouTuber penguinz0, who led online raids on safe havens for victims of dogs.
• Are a fan of Andrew Tate, who states it's “useful” for there to be attack dogs.
• State that it is a redeeming quality for Adolf Hitler to have loved dogs and been a dog owner.

^An exception to much of the above is granted for when you obtain murderous dogs to repel a different murderous threat; this is rarely the case, also the threat is often another dog itself.

You may copy, but only in full.
v. Jun '23