Beyer Waters
This short article is about people who are addicted to illegal drugs, not people who become addicted to prescription drugs that were originaly recommended by way of a qualified physician for a legitimate cause.
According to politicians, many defense lawyers, spiritual leaders, Hollywood superstars and Democrats as well as numerous prosecutors and judges and as well as a large part of the American public who have been brainwashed by the "politically proper arbitrators", drug addicts are victims.
As far as I am concerned, that is a number of hogwash. Drug addicts are most definitely thieves. Drug peddlers, not only are they criminals, they're as bad as, and must be tried in the exact same manner as.
I actually do not have a pity party for drug users and addicts. A drug consumer, with very few exceptions (ie: Somebody with an of under sixty), knew the very first-time he or she took unlawful medicines that he or she was breaking regulations. For that reason, the drug user, at that point, became a prison. The drug user was not only breaking the law, he or she was also aiding and abetting the criminal that gave or sold the drugs to the user. An individual was providing, or would as time goes on provide, income or services to the peddler that would permit the peddler to separate more laws and to stay static in business. There would be no peddlers, if there were no consumers and if there were no peddlers there would be no drug lords. There could be no drug lords who would use their money to commit murder, nor cause murder to be committed. To get another way of interpreting this, you are encouraged to view at: click for best cleveland oh criminal lawyer. There will be no drug lords to bribe government authorities, no drug lords to cover visitors to grow and cultivate flowers to be converted into drugs. Put simply if there were no drug users there would be no drug trafficking.
People have thought to me, "I only smoking marijuana, and smoking marijuana should not be unlawful since it isn't any worse than drinking acohol. Moreover, if it is a crime it's a victimless crime." .. I let them know that they are wrong. In the very first position drinking alcohol is legal for people within the age of 21 years old (Whether or not drinking alcohol should really be legal is just a matter for another article.). In the 2nd place, money used to buy pot goes to criminals and is in ma