Morales Kiilerich

Regular answer

It's a standard answer, nothing else. I'd imagine that 9 times out of five when Google get an email of a site that's fallen in-to oblivion it's some thing related to using methods that go against their webmaster recommendations. It could not function as cas...

My site dropped from no.1 position to nowhere. Google technology people replied to my mail telling me I must have concealed text or used some kind of 'illegal method'! Why don't they just admit it is their mistake?

Standard reply

It's a regular response, nothing else. I would imagine that 9 times out of ten when Google get an email about a site that's dropped into oblivion it's some thing to do with using techniques that go against their webmaster recommendations. It may not be the case with you-but from their perspective I ought to think it a fair response in-the circumstances.

There seems to be some confusion about 'fee'

A 'punishment' is placed on web sites using tricks and sly material to enhance their ratings in Google. A great recent example would be BMW have been using one-page for the various search engines and yet another for the web visitor. Because this was despite Google's directions, BMW were taken from the list entirely -- they were penalised (http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ramping-up-on-international-webspam/). To read more, consider taking a view at: buy recover from panda.

Blocked

Another type of 'charge' although it really is a just a protocol filter, is a webmaster using such things as concealed text or keyword-stuffing, as an example. That gets aggressively blocked (assuming the site is not taken off the index) by the ap-plication of the filter( s) which in turn triggers the site to drop-down the search engine rank. It may seem such as a penalty but it is the result of filtering, not penalty.

Fee differs from 'ignoring' links

When links are ignored, there's no penalty being used, the links simply do not count. The site itself is not penalised, it is only the case that several of the links into that site are not counted. This measure not just filters out spam methods and link farms but also prevents a competitor from acting against another site by so that you can make an effort to bear aggressive filter spamming.

Google does not owe you a living

Google doesn't owe any we